Russell Brand’s life changed dramatically on Monday, November 9, when he was sentenced to more than a decade behind bars following his conviction on multiple charges involving several women.
However, the fallout from the verdict took another turn when his father, Ron Brand, confronted reporters outside Southwark Crown Court in London, openly questioning the jury’s decision.
Rather than expressing sympathy for the women involved, he suggested that his son was the real victim.
His remarks drew scathing reactions on social media, with some users even calling for him to be investigated.
“The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree,” one person said.
Russell Brand’s father drew backlash over his reaction to the verdict
Six women accused Brand of subjecting them to misconduct between 1999 and 2009, with a 12-member jury hearing the case between October 14 and November 3.
On November 5, following two days of deliberations over seven charges brought against the British comedian, the jury found him guilty of one count of forced intimate contact and three other offenses.
Brand received a nine-year prison sentence for the former offense, while the remaining convictions carried terms of nine months, 18 months, and eight months, respectively.
The latter sentences will run concurrently with one another but consecutively to the nine-year term.
When asked whether he had a message for the women involved in the case, Ron Brand responded, “The victims? What about Russell? The girls you mean, who chased him and harassed him?”
The exchange grew increasingly heated when a reporter reminded him that his son had been convicted by the court.
Ron replied, “I don’t care. It’s a system. We don’t believe the justice system.”
Netizens reacted harshly to his comments, with one writing, “The dad should be sentenced too, just because of this drive.”
🚨 WATCH: Russell Brand’s father says it’s “possible” the jury who convicted his son was corrupt
“It’s easy to find the right jury” https://t.co/pp9h53Mmc6
— Politics UK (@PolitlcsUK) November 9, 2026
“So this is where he [Russell Brand] learned it from?” another person asked.
Meanwhile, despite Brand’s lengthy sentence, Ron maintained that he would cope well with life behind bars, describing him as “strong.”
He also expressed confidence in his daughter-in-law, Laura Gallacher, saying she was equally strong.
Brand’s wife had taken the stand in his defense during the trial
Laura Gallacher appeared at Southwark Crown Court on October 29 as a character witness for Russell Brand.
She told the jury that the comedian was “caring, kind and a wonderful father” to their three children.
She also spoke warmly about their marriage, explaining, “The way he treats me is to know me.”
“I feel very seen by him. I love him very much,” she added.
View this post on Instagram
When questioned by the defense about whether her husband respected her wishes when she did not want to be intimate, Gallacher replied, “Yes, absolutely.”
However, she acknowledged that their relationship had not always been straightforward, revealing that Brand had been involved with other women while they were dating.
“I wasn’t interested in having a relationship with him if he was sleeping with other people,” she explained.
Gallacher also admitted that she had been aware of his reputation and had read about his relationships with other women in the press.
Despite their complicated romantic history, though, she described their marriage as “very honest, frank and clear.”
Her testimony came a day after Brand himself had taken the witness stand.
Russell Brand had denied non-consensual encounters throughout the proceedings
Russell Brand acknowledged remembering meetings with some of the women accusing him of misconduct while saying he had no recollection of others.
Although he admitted to having “misused” his fame “very very selfishly,” he maintained that none of his encounters with these women resulted in any forced activity.
🚨 Russell Brand police interrogation videos released after rape conviction.
🎥: Metropolitan Police pic.twitter.com/69BFNH18rH
— TMZ (@TMZ) November 5, 2026
Brand also told the court that he considered consent essential to any relationship, describing it as “fundamental” and “necessary.”
He went on to say that it was, “in many ways, more important than s*x itself.”
Neither his testimony nor his arguments, however, were enough to persuade the jury to clear him of the charges.
Brand is now being investigated over allegations from two more women
Brand has been accused of forced intimate contact by two additional women and has already been questioned by officers in connection with their complaints.
The Metropolitan Police said the investigation “remains ongoing.”
Details contained in legal documents from a hearing at Southwark Crown Court before Brand’s trial began suggest that one of the women was 16 years old at the time of the alleged incident.
Deputy Superintendent Andy Furphy of the Metropolitan Police said the guilty verdicts could encourage more women to speak out, adding that he hoped they would give them the “courage” and “confidence” to come forward.
“Easier for him to blame the women and the system than to look at his son,” a netizen said about Ron Brand
